I agree that "Tuition Cost" seems too simplified. That category should include the other costs of film school. Tweak the category name so that it isn't so restrictive.

How about "total cost" or "cost of attendance" or "affordability"

I think I like affordability the best.

Yes, affordability would work best, because then you could keep the scale consistent (more stars = good, vs more stars = bad for "total cost").

quote:

- Campus/Location
- Film Equipment
- Professors/Curriculum
- Internship/Work Opportunities
- Alumni Connections
- Tuition Cost
- Student to Professor Ratio

So how is everyone with the above rating categories?

The idea is that one would be able to put a 1-5 rating to each of the above categories. There'd also be a general information page about the school with criteria such as length of program... etc...

Would people want to rate undergraduate film schools separately from their graduate counterparts?

Also, would you want to rate different locations seperately... for example... Art Institutes have many locations.... etc etc... Or the different NYFA locations...

Would you want to rate the Pheonix location seperately than the Los Angeles location or lump them into one? I'm thinking the former.

Undergrad and Grad absolutely need to be seperate.