|
Go 
|
New 
|
Find 
|
Notify 
|
|
Reply 
|
|
Admin 
|
New PM! 
|
Owner and Founder of Studentfilms.com

|
The UCLA Program seems interesting after looking at the website - never heard of it before. I have a friend who went to grad school for screenwriting 10 years ago... and now she's not screenwriting. I've always heard of great things from AFI - I've heard good things about Chapman but not necessarily on their screenwriting program. The one main plus of going to film school in LA/Hollywood such as AFI is the contacts that you're going to make. Unfortunately you're not going to make as many contacts online. But - are you going to use the course to learn how to screenwrite and then work your ass off writing scripts and then move to LA and then hustle hustle hustle... or go to AFI and do both at the same time. AFI and Chapman both have great reputations. I'd see what other forum members have to say as well.
|
| |
| Posts: 2506 | Location: Los Angeles, CA U.S.A | Registered: October 30, 2002 |  
IP
|
|
Freshman
|
quote: Originally posted by One Real Wonder: BTW, Chapman is not that far from LA. I ride the train (there is a stop by Chapman) into LA all the time. It's also cheaper to live in the OC than LA, plus crime is vastly lower. Chapman is the better school, but then it's a real school. AFI is a vocational program. It's a good program, but if you want a Masters, then Chapman is it.
I am a bit stunned that the UCLA professional program is "not for you." I have to assume that you want a Masters and are set more on it, than on writing a screenplay.
IMO it's the best value in Film Education you can find.
If you choose Chapman, maybe I will see you at Zito's in Ol' Town.
I'd also get a masters at AFI. And I want to have an MFA. Chapman and AFI have very similar program styles (ChapmanFTV was actually organized by AFI grads). But, overall, I've gotten the impression that AFI is a better program.
|
| |
| Posts: 5 | Location: USA | Registered: May 25, 2010 |  
IP
|
|
Sophomore
|
As a current Chapman screenwriting student, I have to vote against my school. An hour (two or more with traffic) outside of LA is better than most places in the country for getting your foot in the screenwriting door, but it loses out to, you know, actually being in LA.
Chapman is getting better about their screenwriting program, but it's still only a few years out from being an afterthought. I'm glad to be where I am, but if I had it to do over again I'd have applied to a lot more schools, and I'd take UCLA, USC, or AFI over Chapman if I were making my decision now.
That is almost entirely based on location, too. If you're serious about film and you move hundreds or thousands of miles to pursue it, if you have the option, move TO LA and enter a program with a solid track-record for writing rather than one that is still tweaking unless there are things that Chapman does that you want that AFI can't give you.
|
| |
| Posts: 240 | Location: Orange | Registered: February 27, 2009 |  
IP
|
|
Freshman
|
quote: Originally posted by Justin18: You have to take a risk. Learn the craft, study those whom you admire on your own time, and then write, direct, and produce from the heart. This is all.
I'm going to, at grad school.
|
| |
| Posts: 5 | Location: USA | Registered: May 25, 2010 |  
IP
|
|
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|
|